The multi-CDK inhibitor dinaciclib reverses bromo- and extra-terminal domain (BET) inhibitor resistance in acute myeloid leukemia via inhibition of Wnt/ß-catenin signaling.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a highly aggressive hematologic cancer with poor survival across a broad range of molecular subtypes. Development of efficacious and well-tolerable therapies encompassing the range of mutations that can arise in AML remains an unmet need. The bromo- and extra-terminal domain (BET) family of proteins represents an attractive therapeutic target in AML due to their crucial roles in many cellular functions, regardless of any specific mutation. Many BET inhibitors (BETi) are currently in pre-clinical and early clinical development, but acquisition of resistance continues to remain an obstacle for the drug class. Novel methods to circumvent this development of resistance could be instrumental for the future use of BET inhibitors in AML, both as monotherapy and in combination. To date, many investigations into possible drug combinations of BETi with CDK inhibitors have focused on CDK9, which has a known physical and functional interaction with the BET protein BRD4. Therefore, we wished to investigate possible synergy and additive effects between inhibitors of these targets in AML. Here, we describe combination therapy with the multi-CDK inhibitor dinaciclib and the BETi PLX51107 in pre-clinical models of AML. Dinaciclib and PLX51107 demonstrate additive effects in AML cell lines, primary AML samples, and in vivo. Further, we demonstrate novel activity of dinaciclib through inhibition of the canonical/ß-catenin dependent Wnt signaling pathway, a known resistance mechanism to BETi in AML. We show dinaciclib inhibits Wnt signaling at multiple levels, including downregulation of ß-catenin, the Wnt co-receptor LRP6, as well as many Wnt pathway components and targets. Moreover, dinaciclib sensitivity remains unaffected in a setting of BET resistance, demonstrating similar inhibitory effects on Wnt signaling when compared to BET-sensitive cells. Ultimately, our results demonstrate rationale for combination CDKi and BETi in AML. In addition, our novel finding of Wnt signaling inhibition could have potential implications in other cancers where Wnt signaling is dysregulated and demonstrates one possible approach to circumvent development of BET resistance in AML.

What is the role of leukopenia in the assessment of septic arthritis?

Background: It is not well-understood how leukopenia affects the synovial white blood cell (WBC) and percent neutrophils (%PMNs) in the setting of septic arthritis. We sought to determine 1. Do synovial WBC and %PMNs differ between patients with culture positive septic arthritis with or without leukopenia? And 2. Are traditional thresholds of synovial fluid studies for accurately diagnosing septic arthritis still applicable in the leukopenic patient population? Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at a single institution of 79 non-leukopenic and 11 leukopenic patients diagnosed with culture-positive septic arthritis. Demographic data, serum laboratory values, synovial laboratory values, and culture results were recorded. Significant differences in synovial laboratory values were evaluated using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Results are reported as median, interquartile range, and p values. Results: There was a significant difference in synovial WBC in leukopenic patients compared to non-leukopenic patients with culture positive septic arthritis (p = 0.01). No significant difference was found in the synovial %PMNs between two cohorts (p = 0.33). Conclusion: Leukopenic patients with culture positive septic arthritis have significantly lower synovial WBCs compared to non-leukopenic patients. Traditional thresholds for synovial WBC are not reliable for excluding diagnosis of septic arthritis in leukopenic patients.

Assessment for Septic Arthritis in Immunocompetent and Immunocompromised Patients: A Single-Institution Study.

INTRODUCTION: Prompt diagnosis of septic arthritis is imperative to prevent irreversible joint damage. Immunocompromised patients are at an increased risk of septic arthritis as well as secondary systemic infection. Our aims were to identify features predictive of septic arthritis and to determine whether these features differed between immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. METHODS: A single institution retrospective cohort study was performed of 173 immunocompetent and 70 immunocompromised patients who underwent aspiration or arthrotomy for suspected septic arthritis from 2010 to 2018. Demographic data, symptoms, laboratory values, and imaging findings were recorded. Multiple variable logistic regression models were used to assess for predictive factors for septic arthritis in both cohorts. Results were reported as odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P values. RESULTS: In the regression analysis, independent predictive factors for septic arthritis in immunocompetent patients were younger age (P = 0.004), presence of radiographic abnormalities (P = 0.006), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (P < 0.001). For immunocompromised patients, only CRP was an independent continuous predictive factor (P = 0.008) for septic arthritis. A risk stratification tool for predicting septic arthritis in immunocompetent patients using age <55 years, CRP >100 mg/dL, and presence of radiographic abnormalities was developed. A similar tool was created using CRP >180 mg/dL and radiographic abnormalities in immunocompromised patients. DISCUSSION: Differences in predictive factors for septic arthritis between immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients suggest dissimilar clinical presentations. The developed risk stratification tools allow one to predict the likelihood of septic arthritis in both groups. This may permit more accurate selection of patients for surgical intervention in the setting of insufficient data from synovial aspiration.

Inhibiting the Inhibitors of Apoptosis: When Two Targets Are Better Than One.

In this issue of Cancer Discovery, Pullarkat and colleagues present the results from a phase I clinical trial that is the first to combine small-molecule inhibitors for multiple antiapoptotic proteins, BCL2 as well as BCL-XL, with a traditional chemotherapy backbone for patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. This trial has demonstrated impressive response rates with acceptable toxicity while providing proof of concept that dual targeting-hitting BCL2 hard and BCL-XL soft-is both effective and tolerable in a heterogeneous patient population with prior existing cytopenias.See related article by Pullarkat et al., p. 1440.